Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;38(3):462–468. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5034

Table 4:

One-way sensitivity analysis results: probability of cataracta

Probability of Cataract Strategy Cost ($) Effectiveness (QALYs) Incremental Cost ($) Incremental Effectiveness (QALYs) Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio ($/QALY)
0 CTAP 147,110 13.81 0 0
0 TCD 154,719 13.62 7608.40 −0.20 Dominated
0.2 CTAP 147,625 13.80 0 0
0.2 TCD 154,719 13.62 7094.12 −0.18 Dominated
0.4 CTAP 148,139 13.78 0 0
0.4 TCD 154,719 13.62 6579.84 −0.17 Dominated
0.6 CTAP 148,653 13.77 0 0
0.6 TCD 154,719 13.62 6065.56 −0.15 Dominated
0.8 CTAP 149,168 13.75 0 0
0.8 TCD 154,719 13.62 5551.28 −0.13 Dominated
1 CTAP 149,682 13.73 0 0
1 TCD 154,719 13.62 5037.00 −0.12 Dominated
a

In a 1-way sensitivity analysis, CTAP remained the optimal strategy when varying the probability of cataract from 0.0 to 1.0.