Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;38(6):1079–1086. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5166

Table 1:

Demographic and clinical data and conventional MRI metrics in HC, RRMS, RREM, and PPMS groupsa

HC 20 (8/12) RRMS 80 (32/48) RREM MS 40 (16/24) PPMS 24 (9/15) P Valueb
PPMS vs RRMS (RREM) HC vs RRMS (RREM) HC vs PPMS
Age (yr) 48.0 (7.3) 46.9 (7.0) 48.6 (7.0) 47.4 (6.8) .72 (.72) .72 (.72) .72
Disease duration (yr) 12.4 (10.7) 13.2 (11.0) 7.7 (3.3) .006c (.006)c
EDSSd 2.5 (2.5) 4 (0.6) 4.5 (1.6) <.001c (.173)
T1LLd 1.1 (1.1) 1.4 (1.6) 1.8 (3.3) .023c (.276)
T2LLd 2.1 (4.9) 3.6 (7.2) 2.8 (10.6) .431 (.923)
BPF (%) 86.2 (1.5) 84.2 (2.4) 83.8 (2.4) 84.7 (3.0) .490 (.490) <.001 (<.001) .08
CCV (cm3) 4.6 (0.6) 4.1 (0.7) 4.0 (0.7) 4.1 (0.8) .690 (.690) .004 (.001) .013

Note:— – indicates not relevant.

a

The number of participants and the female/male ratio are reported for each group. Unless otherwise indicated, data are reported as mean (SD). Numbers in parentheses in the headers of columns 2–5 are No. of subjects in groups (F/M).

b

Pair-wise comparison (P value). Differences among HC, PPMS, and RRMS (RREM) groups were tested using a t test or Mann-Whitney U test with nonpooled SD (Benjamini-Hochberg correction).

c

Significant.

d

Mann-Whitney U test with nonpooled SD (Benjamini-Hochberg correction) (median and interquartile range).