Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;38(4):672–677. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5063

Figures of merit and 95% CI for reader-specific and multireader evaluation of craniosynostosis using 3D images only and 2D images together with 3D imagesa

Routine
25%
10%
2%
3D Only 2D + 3D 3D Only 2D + 3D 3D Only 2D + 3D 3D Only 2D + 3D
Reader 1 0.89 (0.83–0.96) 0.86 (0.78–0.94) 0.94 (0.88–1.00) 0.92 (0.87–0.98) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.87 (0.75–0.98) 0.90 (0.82–0.97) 0.88 (0.80–0.96)
Reader 2 0.93 (0.88–0.98) 0.94 (0.90–0.99) 0.92 (0.87–0.97) 0.88 (0.82–0.94) 0.86 (0.77–0.95) 0.88 (0.80–0.97) 0.85 (0.76–0.94) 0.85 (0.75–0.94)
Reader 3 0.95 (0.92–0.99) 0.95 (0.92–0.98) 0.90 (0.84–0.97) 0.89 (0.82–0.95) 0.92 (0.87–0.98) 0.93 (0.88–0.98) 0.85 (0.69–1.00) 0.84 (0.68–1.00)
Average 0.92 (0.90–0.95) 0.91 (0.89–0.95) 0.92 (0.88–0.97) 0.89 (0.86–0.94) 0.89 (0.84–0.95) 0.89 (0.83–0.96) 0.86 (0.79–0.94) 0.85 (0.76–0.95)
a

Data presented as FOM (95% CI).