Table 1:
Characteristics of patients with favorable (mTICI = 3) and nonfavorable (mTICI < 3) recanalization outcomea
| Overall (N = 69) | mTICI = 3 (n = 31) | mTICI < 3 (n = 38) | Odds Ratio | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 68.4 ± 14.4 | 66.7 ± 14.1 | 69.8 ± 14.5 | 1.000 | .981 |
| Male sex (No.) | 32 (46%) | 15 (48%) | 17 (45%) | 1.152 | .775 |
| Additional ICA occlusion (No.) | 22 (32%) | 9 (29%) | 13 (34%) | 0.708 | .485 |
| Carotid T occlusion (No.) | 19 (28%) | 5 (16%) | 14 (37%) | 1.768 | .274 |
| Time to recanalization (min) | 119 ± 82 | 108 ± 69 | 127 ± 92 | 0.859 | .389 |
| IVT (No.) | 54 (78%) | 24 (77%) | 30 (79%) | 1.094 | .878 |
| Occlusion length (mm) | 15.6 ± 7.9 | 12.9 ± 6.8 | 17.7 ± 8.1 | 0.409 | .018b |
| Collateralization grade (0–20) | 13.8 ± 4.3 | 13.7 ± 4.5 | 13.7 ± 4.1 | 1.003 | .958 |
| Time delay (sec) | 6.5 ± 2.8 | 6.2 ± 2.1 | 6.7 ± 3.2 | 0.896 | .251 |
a
The last 2 columns show the results of the univariate logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of predictors on recanalization success (N = 69).
b
Statistically significant.