Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;18(4):1099–1114. doi: 10.1007/s11554-021-01086-y

Table 6.

Comparison between the proposed approach with the other works in the literature

Works Acc (%) F1 score (%) Sen (%) Prec (%) TsT (ms)
Proposed 96.47 96.46 96.47 96.46 5.570
Ayan and Ünver [1] 82 80.5 79.5 84 16
Ayan and Ünver [1] 87 87.5 87 20
Kermany et al. [18] 92.8 93.2 90.1
Rahimzadeh et al. [27] 91.40 90.52 72.83
Chouhan et al. [4] 96.38 99.62 93.28 161

Bold values highlight the performance of the proposed algorithm