Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug;38(8):1647–1652. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5237

Table 2:

Disc degeneration in stressed and nonstressed segments of lumbar spine

Baseline Degeneration
Progressive Degeneration
Stressed Discs Control Discs Stressed Discs Control Discs
Annular fissurea,b 0.76 ± 0.35 0.37 ± 0.48 0.07 ± 0.18 0.05 ± 0.22
37 (88.1) 16 (38.1) 6 (14.3) 2 (4.9)
Radial fissurea,b 0.59 ± 0.43 0.17 ± 0.38 0.07 ± 0.18 0.05 ± 0.22
30 (71.4) 8 (19.1) 6 (14.3) 2 (4.9)
Herniationa,b 0.07 ± 0.20 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.00
5 (11.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.4) 0 (0.0)
Nuclear degenerationa,b,c 0.13 ± 0.30 0.05 ± 0.22 0.10 ± 0.28 0.00 ± 0.00
8 (19.1) 2 (4.8) 5 (11.9) 0 (0.0)
Nuclear SI lossa,b,d 0.39 ± 0.42 0.12 ± 0.33 0.17 ± 0.48 0.00 ± 0.00
22 (52.4) 5 (11.9) 6 (14.3) 0 (0.0)
EPDa,b 0.11 ± 0.24 0.12 ± 0.33 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
8 (19.1) 5 (11.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Note:—EPD indicates endplate burden; SI, signal intensity.

a

Burden (mean ± SD) of degenerative parameter calculated on per disc basis.

b

Number (%) of patients with specified degenerative parameters in stressed or control segments of lumbar spine; “Baseline Degeneration” refers to changes on MR scan obtained at the time of presentation and “Progressive Degeneration” refers to appearance of new changes noted on a follow-up MR scan obtained >6 months later.

c

Defined as discs graded higher than 2 on Pfirrmann grading system.

d

Discs graded higher than 1 on a 6-point scale based on SI on T2-weighted images indicating any loss of normal hyperintense signal.