Table 1.
Explanation | |
---|---|
Class | |
High | At least one RCT or SR/meta-analysis with no concern of study quality |
Moderate | At least one RCT or SR/meta-analysis with minor concern of study quality or at least one cohort/case-control/diagnostic test design study with no concern of study quality |
Low | At least one cohort/case-control/diagnostic test study with minor concern of study quality or at least one single arm before-after study, cross-sectional study with no concern of study quality |
Very low | At least one cohort/case-control/diagnostic test design study with serious concern of study quality or at least one single arm before-after study, cross-sectional study with minor/severe concern of study quality |
Grade classification | |
Strong for | The benefit of intervention is greater than harm with high or moderate level of evidence, which can be strongly recommended in most clinical practice. |
Weak for | The benefit and harm of intervention may vary depending on the clinical situation or patient/social value. It is recommended conditionally according to the clinical situation. |
Against | The benefit and harm of intervention may vary depending on the clinical situation or patient/social value. Intervention may not be recommended in clinical practice. |
No recommendation | It is not possible to determine the recommendation direction owing to a lack of evidence or discrepancy of result. Thus further evidence is needed. |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; SR, systematic review.