Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;11:5936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85323-1

Table 3.

The efficacy of Rec-ELISA using rNP, rMLD, and rNP/rMLD for the detection of anti-CCHFV IgG antibodies in sera of acute and convalescent CCHF patients

Rec-ELISA using
rMLD rNP rNP/rMLD
Acute CCHF (day 1–day 7)
Sensitivity 69% (56–79) 72% (59–82) 73% (61–84)
Specificity 98% (88–100) 98% (88–100) 98% (89–100)
Positive predictive value (PPV) 98% (88–100) 98% (89–100) 98% (89 -100)
Negative predictive value (NPV) 68% (55–79) 70% (57–81) 71% (58–82)
Likelihood ratio 29.6% 30.9% 31.6%
Convalescent CCHF (day 8–25)
Sensitivity 89% (73–97) 97% (85–100) 97% (85–100)
Specificity 98% (88–100) 98% (88–100) 98% (88–100)
Positive predictive value (PPV) 97% (84–100) 97% (85–100) 97% (85–100)
Negative predictive value (NPV) 91% (79–98) 98% (88–100) 98% (88–100)
Likelihood ratio 38.1% 41.8% 41.8%

Except for Likelihood ratio, data presented as percent (95% confidence Interval).