Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;34(4):714–723. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0034

Table 5.

Effect of different physical forms of creep feed on serum biochemical parameters of piglets at 10 d after weaning

Items Group1) SEM p-value

PCF HPCF SPCF
TP (g/L) 33.9 33.7 34.1 2.20 0.99
ALB (g/L) 22.0 23.9 22.6 1.30 0.60
AST (U/L) 43.5 39.2 68.8 10.26 0.12
ALT (U/L) 30.3 30.7 34.5 3.62 0.67
GLU (mmol/L) 114.1B 112.3B 75.6A 10.96 0.04
TC (mmol/L) 56.6 60.6 64.9 5.94 0.63
TG (mmol/L) 23.1 23.4 36.6 5.81 0.20
ALP (U/L) 828.7b 668.0ab 548.8a 75.10 0.06
Ca (mmol/L) 8.7 9.0 8.8 0.35 0.88
P (mmol/L) 5.6 7.2 7.1 0.55 0.11
SCREA (μmol/L) 72.8 70.7 67.3 8.46 0.90

SEM, standard error of the mean; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GLU, glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; ALP, phosphatase; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; SCREA, serum creatinine.

1)

PCF, piglets received powder creep feed; HPCF, piglets received hard pellet creep feed; SPCF, piglets received soft pellet creep feed.

A,B

Means in the same row with different superscript letters were significantly different (p≤0.05).

a,b

Means in the same row with different superscript letters tended to be different (0.05<p<0.10).