Table 3.
Summary of the Spearman’s correlation analysis for numeric and continuous variables. The distribution of intraoperative eloquent spots was not normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test p < 0.001) and therefore a nonparametric test was chosen for the correlation analysis.
Variables | Age | Tumor Volume | Brain-Grid Voxels | Intratumoral Cortical | Intratumoral Subcortical | Peritumoral Cortical | Peritumoral Subcortical | Resection Grade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Corr. Co | 1 | 0.161 | 0.101 | 0.406 * | −0.161 | −0.451 * | −0.089 | −0.127 |
p | 0.349 | 0.557 | 0.014 | 0.399 | 0.006 | 0.605 | 0.462 | ||
Tumor volume | Corr. Co | 0.161 | 1 | 0.689 * | 0.17 | 0.094 | −0.226 | −0.511 * | −0.627 * |
p | 0.349 | 0 | 0.32 | 0.587 | 0.184 | 0.001 | 0 | ||
Brain-Grid voxels | Corr. Co | 0.101 | 0.689 * | 1 | 0.012 | 0.155 | −0.112 | −0.326 | −0.316 |
p | 0.557 | 0 | 0.944 | 0.366 | 0.517 | 0.052 | 0.06 | ||
Intratumoral eloquent spots cortical | Corr. Co | 0.406 * | 0.17 | 0.012 | 1 | 0.024 | −0.366 * | −0.037 | −0.411 * |
p | 0.014 | 0.32 | 0.944 | 0.891 | 0.028 | 0.828 | 0.013 | ||
Intratumoral eloquent spots Subcortical | Corr. Co | −0.145 | 0.094 | 0.155 | 0.024 | 1 | 0.264 | −0.281 | −0.122 |
p | 0.399 | 0.587 | 0.366 | 0.891 | 0.119 | 0.097 | 0.477 | ||
Peritumoral eloquent spots cortical | Corr. Co | −0.451 * | −0.226 | −0.112 | −0.366 * | 0.264 | 1 | 0.068 | 0.153 |
p | 0.006 | 0.184 | 0.517 | 0.028 | 0.119 | 0.695 | 0.372 | ||
Peritumoral eloquent spots subcortical | Corr. Co | −0.089 | −0.511 * | −0.326 | −0.037 | −0.281 | 0.068 | 1 | 0.501 * |
p | 0.605 | 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.828 | 0.097 | 0.695 | 0.002 | ||
Resection grade | Corr. Co | −0.127 | −0.627 * | −0.316 | −0.411 * | −0.122 | 0.153 | 0.501 * | 1 |
p | 0.462 | 0 | 0.06 | 0.013 | 0.477 | 0.372 | 0.002 |
Corr. Co, correlation coefficient. * Correlation is significant with p value < 0.05.