Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr 11;48(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26040

TABLE 2.

Intertechnique Consistency for Quantifying Regurgitant Volume

Mitral Regurgitation Tricuspid Regurgitation
Pearson 95% Limits of agreement ICC Pearson 95% Limits of agreement ICC
Regurgitant flow volume (L/min)
 Direct 0.813 (−2.72, 1.90) 0.804 0.985 (−1.27, 1.61) 0.982
 Indirect 0.971 (−0.76, 0.98) 0.953 0.977 (−0.96, 1.70) 0.973
Regurgitant fraction (%)
 Direct 0.868 (−16.85, 13.03) 0.870 0.974 (−4.35, 11.85) 0.956
 Indirect 0.933 (−13.41, 14.41) 0.878 0.837 (−12.85, 20.43) 0.785
Regurgitant volume (mL/beat)
 Direct 0.793 (−39.50, 25.68) 0.771 0.972 (−20.67, 27.42) 0.971
 Indirect 0.952 (−13.13, 14.24) 0.949 0.959 (−16.72, 28.72) 0.955

Data in parentheses are Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement.

ICC = interclass correlation coefficient, 2-way random effects absolute agreement model.