The overall risk of bias for all of the lung studies was a high risk of bias (56.8%) and some concerns (43.2%). The selection of the reported result had a high risk of bias (46.9%) and some concerns (53.1%). The measurement of the outcome had a high risk of bias (13%), some concerns (32.7%), and low risk of bias (54.3%). The missing outcome data domain had a low risk of bias (99.4%) and a high risk of bias (0.6%). Deviations from intended interventions had a low risk of bias (90.7%), some concerns (4.3%), and high risk of bias (4.9%). The randomization process had a high risk of bias (15.4%), some concerns (79%), and low risk of bias (5.6%).