Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;176:114883. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114883

Table 5.

Comparison of previous works with the proposed work

Authors Number of cases Method/s used Accuracy
Hemdan et al. (2020) 25 COVID-19(+)
25 Normal
COVIDX-Net 90.0%
Zhang et al. (2020) 100 COVID-19(+)
1431 COVID-19(−)
18-layer residual CNN 96%
Ozturk et al. (2020) (a) 125 COVID-19(+)
500 No Findings
DarkCovidNet (a) 98.08%
(b) 125 COVID-19(+)
500 Pneumonia
500 No Findings
(b) 87.02%
Oh et al. (2020) 8851 Normal
6012 Pneumonia
180 COVID-19(+)
Patch-based CNN 88.9%
Abbas et al. (2020) 80 Normal
105 COVID-19
11 SARS
DeTRAC 95.12%
Proposed method 795 COVID-19(+)
795 Normal
711 Others
VGG16, DenseNet121, Xception, NASNet, EfficientNet 79.01%, 89.96%, 88.03%, 85.03%, 93.48%