Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;11(2):613–618. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa011

Table 2.

Participant-rated evaluations for responding empathically to patients: a communication skills training module to reduce lung cancer stigma (n = 30)

Items from module evaluation M (SD) Endorsement
1. I feel confident that I will use the skills I learned in this module. 4.70 (.47) 100%
2. The skills I learned in this module will allow me to provide better patient care. 4.73 (.45) 100%
3. The module prompted me to critically evaluate my own communication skills. 4.73 (.45) 100%
4. The skills I learned were reinforced through the feedback I received in the small group. 4.77 (.43) 100%
5. The small group facilitators were effective. 4.90 (.31) 100%
6. The information in the module related closely to me. 4.46 (.65) 92.3%
7. I identified with the lung cancer clinician–patient interactions that were discussed in the module. 4.54 (.76) 92.3%
8. The module contained a lot of information about communication skills and empathy that was new to me. 3.81 (.98) 65.4%
9. The module taught me something new about using empathy to reduce lung cancer patients’ experience of stigma. 4.65 (.56) 96.1%
10. The module taught me something new about discussing smoking with my patients with empathy and sensitivity. 4.54 (.58) 96.2%
11. The information in the module was hard to understand. (R) 4.27 (.83) 96.2%
12. The didactic was easy to follow. 4.46 (.58) 96.2%
Items from program evaluations
13. Didactic teaching 2.63 (.56) 96.7%
14. Exemplary video 2.73 (.58) 93.3%
15. Role-play experience 2.87 (.43) 96.7%

Items 1–12 were scored on a five-point Likert scale with anchors at (1) “Strongly Disagree” to (5) “Strongly Agree;” Items 13–15 were scored on a three-point Likert scale with anchors at (1) “Did not aid in my learning at all” to (3) “Aided in my learning a lot.” Endorsement = percentage of participants that endorsed “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” (Items 1–12) or percentage of participants that endorsed “Aided my learning somewhat” or “Aided my learning a lot” (Items 13–15).