Table 2.
Full dose (n=62) | Reduced dose (n=41) | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Sex, n (%) | 0.860 | ||
Female | 25 (40) | 16 (39) | |
Male | 37 (60) | 25 (61) | |
| |||
Age (years), median (range) | 67 (21–86) | 76 (44–86) | 0.007 |
| |||
Patient effective diameter* (cm), median (range) | 44 (23–59) | 40 (27–52) | 0.079 |
| |||
Tumor size* (cm), median (range) | 3 (1.0–5.4) | 3 (1.5–5.0) | 0.409 |
| |||
Number of cryoprobes, median (range) | 6 (1–11) | 6 (3–11) | 0.609 |
| |||
Ancillary procedure performed, n (%) | 0.953 | ||
Yes | 20 (32) | 13 (32) | |
No | 42 (68) | 28 (68) | |
| |||
Number of scans, median (range) | 27 (14–53) | 26 (13–41) | 0.518 |
| |||
Procedure time (min), median (range) | 34 (17–64) | 34 (20–52) | 0.685 |
The data is presented as n (%), unless otherwise noted. The p values from the Pearson chi-square test (categorical variables) and the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney (rank-sum) test (continuous) comparisons between the two groups are provided. Significance was taken if p < 0.05.
Patient effective diameter and tumor size were calculated according to Nguyen et al. (23).