Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;38(1):132–138. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4960

Table 4:

Clinical characteristics, treatment strategy, and response in 13 patients with DAVF types with CVD

Case No. Sex Age (yr) Cognard Type before SRS Treatment Cognard Type after Venoplasty/Stent Treatment after SRS Follow-Up Duration (mo) Response
1 F 41 IIa+b Venoplasty/stent IIa 46 PR
2 M 63 IIa+b Venoplasty IIa 38 CR
3 M 56 IIa+b Venoplasty/stent IIa 19 PRa
4 M 45 IIa+b NA 15 CR
5 F 63 IIa+b Venoplasty/stent IIa+b 10 PRa
6 M 73 IIa+b NA 10 PR
7 M 17 IIa+b Venoplasty/stent IIa+b 6 PR
8 M 55 IIb NA 5.6 PR
9 M 19 III NA TAE twice 17 PR
10 M 27 III Venoplasty IIa 27 CRb
11 M 12 III 13 CR
12 M 27 IV 27.6 PR
13 M 55 IV NA NA

Note:—TAE indicates transarterial embolization; CR, complete regression; PR, partial regression; –, no adjunct treatment was performed; NA, not available.

a

Restenosis of sinus after venoplasty and stenting.

b

Asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage on MR imaging.