Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;37(12):2209–2216. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4907

Table 4:

P values of comparisons for the sum of scores for the MR imaging features and ASL parameters among the 3 pathologic grades

WHO Grade Sum of Scores nCBF-sTI nCBF-mTI nBAT
II vs III .139 .098 .021a .005a
II vs IV .015a .006a <.001a .078
III vs IV 1 .905 .023a 1
LGGs vs HGGs .006a .003a <.001a .002a
a

Significant at 95% (for intergroup comparisons among the WHO II, III, and IV grades. P values have been multiplied by 3 for Bonferroni correction).