Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar;31(3):541–548. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1839

Table 4:

Quantitative MR imaging parameters by tissue type and clinical groupa

NAWM DAWM Lesions Significant Pair-wise Comparisons between Tissue Types Significant Comparisons between Disease Types
ADC (μm2 s−1) PP 805 ± 53 842 ± 48 1042 ± 216 Lesions vs NAWM, P < .05
SP 798 ± 40 903 ± 77 1201 ± 131 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .001; DAWM vs lesions, P < .001; lesions vs NAWM, P < .001
FA PP 0.383 ± 0.058 0.350 ± 0.047 0.318 ± 0.110 DAWM vs NAWM P < .01; DAWM vs lesions, P < .05; lesions vs NAWM, P < .001
SP 0.365 ± 0.033 0.322 ± 0.030 0.242 ± 0.054 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .001; DAWM vs lesions, P < .001; lesions vs NAWM, P < .001
MTR (%) PP 32.9 ± 0.6 31.1 ± 1.0 28.2 ± 3.6 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .01; lesions vs NAWM, P < .05 DAWM SP vs PP, P < .001; lesions SP vs PP, P < .01
SP 32.8 ± 1.2 28.8 ± 0.8 21.3 ± 3.3 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .001; DAWM vs lesions, P < .001; lesions vs NAWM, P < .001
T1 (ms) PP 759 ± 27 823 ± 38 1040 ± 185 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .05 DAWM SP vs PP, P < .001; lesions SP vs PP, P < .05
SP 815 ± 47 958 ± 67 1419 ± 298 DAWM vs NAWM, P < .001; DAWM vs lesions, P < .001; lesions vs NAWM, P < .001
a

Means and SDs of ADC, FA, MTR, and T1 in NAWM, DAWM, and lesions by clinical group (PP or SPMS). Bonferroni-corrected P values derived from general linear mixed model analysis are indicated for statistically significant pair-wise differences between tissue types and disease types. Details of statistical analyses are provided in the text.