Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;36(4):744–750. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4198

Table 2:

Comparison between the maze and the conventional groups

Maze Group (n = 8) Conventional Group (n = 30) Conventional Group Using Intracranial Stents (n = 15) P Value between Maze Group and Conventional Group P Value between Maze Group and Conventional Group Using Intracranial Stents
Age 65 ± 11.5 65.4 ± 13.0 68.3 ± 13.2 .93 .56
Sex (male:female) 1:7 8:22 3:12 .29 .41
Location (ICA:others) 8:0 20:10 8:7 .064 .026a
Packing attenuation (%) 37.4 ± 5.9 26.2 ± 5.6 27.9 ± 4.6 <.01a <.01a
Maximum diameter (mm) 19 ± 4.4 13.4 ± 3.8 13.9 ± 5.0 <.01a .02a
Aneurysm volume (mL) 2.03 ± 1.40 1.09 ± 1.52 1.38 ± 2.12 .13 .41
No. of coils 33.3 ± 16.1 15.5 ± 10.1 18.7 ± 12.4 .017a .047a
Angiographic recurrence 0 11 3 .036a .26
Perioperative complications 3 2 5 .31 .34
Periprocedural death or major stroke 0 5 3 .28 .26
Reintervention 0 4 2 .34 .41
a

Significant P value.