Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;36(4):638–645. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4186

Table 1:

Regression-derived effects of scan duration on various hemodynamic measurements

Hemodynamic Measurement Deconvolution Algorithm Function Used for CBV Integration t-statistic Slopea Potential Truncation Effectb Lesion Reversal Frequency
CBVc None Concentration 41.53 1.08/log10(s) 47.6% 37% (21/57)
sCBVr sSVD Response 17.99 1.46/log10(s) 64.2% 35% (20/57)
oCBVr oSVD Response 16.72 1.17/log10(s) 51.4% 46% (26/57)
sCBF sSVD NA 9.62 0.09/log10(s) 4.10% 4% (2/57)
oCBF oSVD NA 3.58 0.04/log10(s) 1.96% 2% (1/57)
sMTTc sSVD Concentration 34.49 3.03/log10(s) 133% 47% (27/57)
sMTTr sSVD Response 35.57 3.73/log10(s) 164% 28% (16/57)
oMTTc oSVD Concentration 42.50 3.79/log10(s) 166% 54% (31/57)
oMTTr oSVD Response 51.15 4.67/log10(s) 205% 39% (22/57)
sTmax sSVD NA 25.91 14.10/log10(s) 6.19 seconds 44% (25/57)
oTmax oSVD NA 28.62 18.2/log10(s) 8.00 seconds 42% (24/57)

Note:—NA indicates not applicable.

a

The slopes of all 11 hemodynamic parameters with respect to the logarithm of scan duration were significantly greater than zero (P < .001). Therefore, t-statistics rather than P values are reported.

b

“Potential truncation effect” refers to the expected reduction in the calculated parameter value that would result from decreasing the scan duration from 110 seconds to 40 seconds postinjection. For example, if the CBVc value derived from a 110-second scan were 107.6% of normal, the expected CBVc using a 40-second scan would be 60.0% of normal.