Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;32(8):1496–1503. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2531

Table 3:

Diffusion tensor values in each groupa

Parameters HC (n=20) INPH (n=16) AD (n=10) SVaD (n=10) ANOVA, F or H Value
Anterior PVWM
    FA 0.53 (0.02) 0.54 (0.03)b 0.54 (0.02) 0.49 (0.03) 8.83c
    MD 0.50 (0.02) 0.55 (0.03)b,d,e 0.52 (0.02) 0.61 (0.03) 40.15c
Posterior PVWM
    FAf 0.55 (0.54–0.55) 0.57 (0.56–0.57)b,d 0.56 (0.55–0.56) 0.51 (0.50–0.53) 24.58c
    MD 0.53 (0.02) 0.55 (0.03)b 0.53 (0.02) 0.61 (0.03) 25.20c
aIC
    FA 0.55 (0.02) 0.59 (0.04)b,d 0.57 (0.03) 0.50 (0.04) 16.64c
    MD 0.49 (0.02) 0.53 (0.04)b,d,e 0.50 (0.03) 0.60 (0.04) 33.32c
pIC
    FA 0.59 (0.02) 0.63 (0.03)b,d,e 0.60 (0.02) 0.57 (0.02) 18.67c
    MDf 0.48 (0.47–0.48) 0.50 (0.49–0.52)d 0.48 (0.47–0.49) 0.56 (0.54–0.57) 31.03c
Genu, CC
    FAf 0.70 (0.64–0.71) 0.66 (0.60–0.70) 0.66 (0.64–0.70) 0.64 (0.62–0.67) 5.45
    MDf 0.58 (0.55–0.61) 0.67 (0.63–0.75)d 0.62 (0.67–0.65) 0.69 (0.61–0.75) 20.67g
Splenium, CC
    FAf 0.64 (0.62–0.66) 0.64 (0.60–0.68)b 0.66 (0.63–0.68) 0.56 (0.52–0.63) 11.59g
    MD 0.85 (0.17) 0.82 (0.14)b 0.88 (0.12) 1.03 (0.16) 4.26g
SLF
    FA 0.47 (0.02) 0.50 (0.03)b,d 0.48 (0.02) 0.44 (0.03) 11.86c
    MD 0.48 (0.02) 0.51 (0.02)b,d,e 0.49 (0.02) 0.56 (0.02) 36.00c
ILF
    FA 0.49 (0.02) 0.47 (0.03)d 0.49 (0.03) 0.46 (0.02) 4.72g
    MDf 0.57 (0.55–0.65) 0.57 (0.54–0.62)b 0.59 (0.57–0.64) 0.64 (0.60–0.67) 7.85g
a

Variables are mean (±SD) or median (interquartile range).

b

P < .05, compared with the SVaD group.

c

P < .001.

d

P < .05, compared with the HC group.

e

P < .05, compared with the AD group.

f

The Dunn method was used to correct multiple comparisons. In other cases, the Holm-Sidak method was used.

g

P < .05.