SUMMARY:
Clopidogrel is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation, indicated for the prevention of ischemic stroke and in-stent thrombosis. However, it has a number of drawbacks, including an increased risk of hemorrhage; a clinical effect that is slow in onset and irreversible; a genetically determined variability in its clinical potency; and interactions with other commonly administered drugs.
Clopidogrel (Plavix, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Washington, DC; Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, New Jersey) is a prodrug of the thienopyridine family, which has little, if any, platelet inhibitory effect in its original state. Its active form (Act-Met) is produced by metabolism of the prodrug through the cytochrome P450 system of the liver, most particularly by the enzyme CYP2C19.
Act-Met permanently and irreversibly disables the G protein−coupled platelet receptor known as P2Y12. P2Y12, normally activated by ADP, brings about conformational change of the surface molecule GPIIb/IIIa. This conformational change increases the affinity of GPIIb/IIIa for the divalent bridging molecules fibrinogen and VWF, thereby allowing platelet aggregation (Fig 1). As such, activated clopidogrel-mediated disabling of this G protein−coupled receptor leads to diminished aggregation of platelets.
Clinical Indication
According to the most recent AHA/American Stroke Association Council “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke,”1 clopidogrel is indicated to prevent noncardioembolic stroke in patients with known atherosclerotic disease, though it is not definitely superior to aspirin or aspirin/dipyridamole for this purpose. The same guidelines asserted that, currently, insufficient evidence exists to recommend its administration in the acute treatment of ischemic stroke.
Clopidogrel is familiar to the neurointerventionalist in the setting of intracranial or extracranial carotid/vertebral stent placement. The evidence to support its use in this circumstance is primarily extrapolation from trials of coronary arterial stent placement.
Administration
Plavix is commercially available only in an oral form. Trials validating its effectiveness in the setting of secondary prevention of ischemic stroke have used once-daily doses of 75 mg. This dose is expected to result in a steady-state effect on platelet aggregation after approximately 5–6 days.2 This dose is, however, arbitrary, and may not be sufficient to produce optimal platelet inhibition in all patients.
In the acute setting of emergent arterial stent placement, the optimal loading dose has not been clearly established in the cardiology literature; there is some evidence to suggest that 600- or 900-mg loading doses are more efficacious than the traditionally used 300-mg loading dose.3 A loading dose of 900 mg may result in the same level of platelet inhibition after just 2 hours as a loading dose of 300 mg achieves after 6 hours.4
Side Effects
The most clinically significant side effect of clopidogrel is hemorrhage. The observed risk with clopidogrel is significantly lower than that observed with aspirin for GI bleeding (2% versus 2.66% for clopidogrel and aspirin, respectively) and is similar for intracranial hemorrhage (0.31% versus 0.42% for clopidogrel and aspirin, respectively).5 Other side effects include pruritus and rash6 and, rarely, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.7
Poor Responders
It is believed that a subset of approximately one-third of patients are “poor responders” to clopidogrel,8 with diminished in vitro reduction of ADP-induced platelet aggregation and proved increased risk of in-stent and native arterial thrombosis.9
The most important intrinsic determinant of this variable response is likely to be related to polymorphisms within the genes that regulate CYP2C19 activity,10 and these are particularly common in Asian populations.11
A further likely intrinsic determinant is variable intestinal absorption, thought to be related to polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene.10
There are various commercially available tests of in vitro platelet function, including ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. Their clinical utility in determining clopidogrel clinical response and dosing is controversial.
Interactions
With regard to pharmacokinetic interactions, the most important are with drugs that inhibit CYP2C19 activity and thereby reduce conversion of the prodrug to its active form. The most important of these is the PPI group; these medications are both ubiquitous (available over-the-counter in many countries) and are often deliberately coadministered to patients receiving clopidogrel to reduce the risk of GI hemorrhage.
There is definite reduced ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel when PPIs are coadministered.12 However, the current position of the AHA is that there is no conclusive evidence that this translates to an increased risk of clinically significant thrombosis.13
Strategies suggested to minimize PPI-induced inhibition include substituting the less inhibitory pantoprazole for omeprazole,14 and spacing clopidogrel and PPI doses 12 hours apart from each other.15 The entire subject remains controversial.
Economic Issues
The cost of Plavix was estimated at US $103 per month in 2007 inflation-adjusted terms, compared with US $6 per month for aspirin, in a study comparing the cost-effectiveness of the 2 agents.16 This does, however, compare favorably with the newer thienopyridines, and with the direct GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. Clopidogrel is protected by US patent until May 201217; generic versions may further reduce the cost of treatment.
Summary
Clopidogrel remains a front-line drug in the prevention of arterial thrombosis in high-risk patients, such as those with arterial stents and those with atherosclerotic disease. However, its problematic pharmacokinetics mean that it may be supplanted by the newer P2Y12 antagonists, which have fewer clinically significant drug interactions, a faster onset, reversibility, and more predictable and greater clinical potency.
Feature | Recommendations, Effect |
---|---|
Dosing | Loading dose 300–900 mg, maintenance dose 75 mg daily |
Time to onset | 5–6 Hours to reach maximal platelet inhibition but increasing doses achieve the same level of platelet inhibition more rapidly |
Metabolism | Converted to active form in the liver by the CYP450 system, most particularly enzymes 1A2, 2C19, and 3A4 |
Action | Irreversibly disables P2Y12 platelet receptor, preventing ADP-induced downstream conformational change of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor that is required for platelet activation |
Interactions that increase potency | Cigarette smoke (controversial) |
Interactions that decrease potency | PPIs (controversial) |
Side effects | Hemorrhage, rash, pruritus, TTP |
Cost | US $103/month (2007) |
Note:—TTP indicates thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
ABBREVIATIONS
- Act-Met
active metabolite of clopidogrel
- ADP
adenosine diphosphate
- AHA
American Hospital Association
- GI
gastrointestinal
- GPIIb/IIIa
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
- PPI
proton pump inhibitor
- VWF
von Willebrand factor
Footnotes
Disclosures: David Kallmes—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: ev3, Penumbra, MicroVention, Sequent, NFocus, Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: ev3, CareFusion, Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: MicroVention.
References
- 1. Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke—co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 2006;37:577–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reinhart KM, White CM, Baker WL. Prasurgel: a critical comparison with clopidogrel. Pharmacotherapy 2009;29:1441–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines—2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation 2008;117:261–95. Epub 2007 Dec 13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Montalescot G, Sideris G, Meuleman C, et al. A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:931–38. Epub 2006 Aug 17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Harker LA, Boissel JP, Pilgrim AJ, et al. Comparative safety and tolerability of clopidogrel and aspirin: results from CAPRIE—CAPRIE Steering Committee and Investigators. clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events. Drug Saf 1999;21:324–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Plavix [package insert]. http://products.sanofi-aventis.us/plavix/plavix.html. Accessed October 18, 2011
- 7. Bennett CL, Connors JM, Carwile JM, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1773–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1505–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J, et al. High post-treatment platelet reactivity identified low-responders to dual antiplatelet therapy at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after stenting for acute coronary syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:542–49. Epub 2005 Dec 22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2009;360:363–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. NDA 20–839 S-044. Plavix label. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/020839s0511b1.pdf. Accessed October 18, 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily C, et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:256–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Abraham N, Hlatky M, Antman E, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 expert consensus document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:2533–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sibbing D, Morath T, Stegherr J, et al. Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. J Thromb Haemost 2009;101:714–19 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Laine L, Hennekens C. Proton pump inhibitor and clopidogrel interaction: fact or fiction? Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:34–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chen J, Bhatt DL, Schneider Dunn E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CHARISMA trial. Value Health 2009;12:872–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pierson R, Bansal P. U.S. judge upholds Bristol, Sanofi patent on Plavix. Reuters. June 19. 2007. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/18/sanofi-apotex-patent-idUSN1E79H1NL20111018. Accessed 18 October 2011