Table 4:
Sample size estimatesa
% Inactive Patients in Placebo Group | % Decrease in Mean Lesion Volume of Active Patients | Absolute % Increase in Inactive Patientsb |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | ||
10 | 0 | – | – | – | 435 | 225 | 124 |
10 | 518 | 309 | 204 | 139 | 86 | 65 | |
20 | 128 | 101 | 82 | 65 | 47 | 38 | |
30 | 56 | 50 | 43 | 35 | 30 | 27 | |
40 | 31 | 28 | 24 | 22 | 21 | 19 | |
50 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 16 | |
40 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | 580 |
10 | 470 | 369 | 315 | 251 | 199 | 153 | |
20 | 121 | 115 | 94 | 83 | 75 | 66 | |
30 | 49 | 44 | 44 | 40 | 37 | 36 | |
40 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 21 | 20 | |
50 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 15 |
Number of patients per treatment arm necessary to perform parallel-group-designed trials with a statistical power of 80%, to detect treatment effects ranging from 0% to 50% increase in inactive patients and a 0%–50% reduction in mean enhancing-lesion volume in active patients.
– Indicates percentage increase of patients developing no/zero enhancing lesions during follow-up.