Skip to main content
. 2014 May;35(5):935–942. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3857

Table 3:

Secondary end pointsa

Assessment BMC (n = 315) Matrix2 (n = 311) Relative Risk (95% CI) Difference (95% CI) P Value
Angiographic assessment by core laboratory
    Modified Raymond Scale after procedure
        1) Complete obliteration 89 (35.6%) 87 (36.6%) 0.97 (0.77–1.23) −1.0% (−9.5–7.6) .9894
        2) Residual neck/dog ear 68 (27.2%) 60 (25.2%) 1.08 (0.80–1.45) 2.0% (−5.8–9.8)
        3) Residual aneurysm 93 (37.2%) 91 (38.2%) 0.97 (0.77–1.22) −1.0% (−9.6–7.6)
    Modified Raymond Scale at 455-day FU or re-intervention
        1) Complete obliteration 99 (39.9%) 105 (44.3%) 0.90 (0.73–1.11) −4.4% (−13.2–4.4) .8297
        2) Residual neck/dog ear 69 (27.8%) 48 (20.3%) 1.37 (1.00–1.90) 7.6% (0.0–15.1)
        3) Residual aneurysm 80 (32.3%) 84 (35.4%) 0.91 (0.71–1.17) −3.2% (−11.6–5.2)
Aneurysm change
    Better 81 (32.7%) 60 (25.4%) 1.28 (0.97–1.70) 7.2% (−0.8–15.3) .1225
    Same 82 (33.1%) 85 (36.0%) 0.92 (0.72–1.17) −3.0% (−11.4–5.5)
    Worse 85 (34.3%) 91 (38.6%) 0.89 (0.70–1.13) −4.3% (−12.9–4.3)
Neurologic assessment
    Worseb mRS score
        At post-index procedure 25 (8.5%) 30 (10.5%) 0.81 (0.49–1.35) −2.0% (−6.7–2.8) .4220
        At 455 days follow-upc 33 (11.7%) 28 (9.9%) 1.19 (0.74–1.92) 1.9% (−3.2–7.0) .4705
Technical success
    Technical procedure successd 307 (97.5%) 301 (96.8%) 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.7% (−1.9–3.3) .6130

Note:—FU indicates follow-up.

a

Values are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and No. (%) for categoric variables. The denominator used for rates (%) can be smaller than the number of subjects in each group due to missing values.

b

Compared with the pre-index procedure.

c

All causes of deaths within 455 days were incorporated as a follow-up mRS score of 6.

d

Technical success evaluated at the patient level.