Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;34(6):1219–1226. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3337

Table 3:

Treatment and follow-up of dissections and dissecting aneurysms

Treatment and Follow-Up Data
Treatment method (initial)
    Stent only 44 (88.0%)
    Coils only 2 (4.0%)
    Combination stent and coils 4 (8.0%)
Stent therapy
    Single 31 (64.6%)
    Multiple 17 (35.4%)
Result (immediate)
    Complete luminal restoration/pseudoaneurysm occlusion 25 (50.0%)
    Acceptable luminal restoration/minimal pseudoaneurysm filling 25 (50.0%)
    Persistent high-grade stenosis (<30%) 0
Complications
    Stent occlusion 1 (2.0 %)
    Stent-related pseudoaneurysm 1 (2.0%)
    Transient weakness 2 (4.0%)
    Transient visual loss 1 (2.0%)
Follow-up imaging (No. of exams)
    CTA 64
    MRA 17
    Conventional angiogram 23
Follow-up imaging (No. of patients)
    CTA or MRA 39 (83.0%)
    CTA and MRA 9 (9.0%)
    Conventional angiogram 15 (31.9%)
    No follow-up 7 (14.9%)
Retreatment
    Injuries requiring repeat treatment 3 (6.0%)
    Average time to retreatment (wk) 3
Initially untreated injuries requiring treatment on follow-up 21 (42.0%)
    Initial Grade 2a 3 (14.3%)
    Initial Grade 3a 18 (85.7%)
Average time to treatment for initially untreated injuries (wk) 5