Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;33(10):1939–1944. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3090

Table 2:

CBF and ATT for patients with VB disease and controls separated by group and ROI

Control (n = 20)
Patient (n = 21)
Between-GroupsP Value Within-VBP Value
Mean SD Mean SD
CBF (mL/100 g/min)
    PAR 29.7 7.5 24.9 10.1 0.096 0.459
    OCC 31.8 10.5 21.8 9.9 0.003a 0.371
CBF-sig (mL/100 g/min)
    PAR 31.3 6.5 27.9 8.7 0.161 0.359
    OCC 32.4 10.1 22.6 9.6 0.003a 0.307
ATT (s)
    PAR 0.75 0.10 0.84 0.20 0.094 0.763
    OCC 0.82 0.11 0.87 0.34 0.599 0.026b
ATT-sig (s)
    PAR 0.73 0.08 0.76 0.13 0.438 0.059
    OCC 0.82 0.10 0.81 0.26 0.918 0.010b

Note:—The percentage of significant voxels for CBF and ATT are shown (ie, % CBF-sig voxels and % ATT-sig voxels). ROI-adjusted CBF-sig and ATT-sig are shown, achieved by excluding voxels with a poor fit. For group comparison, a indicates a significant difference (P < .05). For within-VB analysis, b indicates a significant within-VB difference (P < .05). OCC indicates occipital cortex; PAR, parietal cortex.