Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;47(2):530–541. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa136

Table 6.

Results of Multiple Regression Analysis With Neurocognitive Test Scores as Dependent Variables

Dependent Variables Explanatory Variables β t P F  model df P R  2
#1. List learning Model 9.95 4/153 <.001 .206
HMGB1 −.228 −3.08 .002
Education .244 3.35 .001
DKK1 −.179 −2.45 .015
CCL11 −.152 −2.08 .039
#2. Digit sequencing task Model 19.30 4/153 <.001 .335
HMGB1 −.402 −5.84 <.001
IL-6 −.192 −2.78 .006
Education .163 2.42 .017
CCL11 −.160 −2.40 .018
#3. Category instances Model 13.37 3/154 <.001 .207
HMGB1 −.292 −4.01 <.001
DKK1 −.242 −3.33 .001
Education .165 2.28 .024
#4. COWA Model 38.83 2/155 <.001 .334
HMGB1 −.490 −7.23 <.001
IL-6 −.208 −3.07 .003
#5. Symbol coding Model 50.34 2/154 <.001 .395
HMGB1 −.583 −9.20 <.001
DKK1 .165 −2.61 .010
#6. Tower of London Model 26.36 3/154 <.001 .339
HMGB1 −.436 −6.56 <.001
Education .279 4.32 <.001
DKK1 −.153 −2.30 .023

Note: CCL11, CC-motif chemokine 11 or eotaxin; DKK1, Dickkopf protein 1; FTD, formal thought disorders; HMGB1, high mobility group box 1 protein; IL, interleukin; PMR, psychomotor retardation; SANS, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms.