Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;35(6):1058–1065. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3718

Table 2:

Diagnostic performance of 11C-MET PET in subgroups of brain tumors

Analysis No. of Studies (pts) Independent Estimates (95% CI)
LR (95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR−
Design
    Prospective 4 (156) 0.91 (0.84–0.95) 0.92 (0.78–0.97) 11.49 (3.87–34.08) 0.10 (0.06–0.18)
    Retrospective 7 (260) 0.91 (0.81–0.96) 0.84 (0.73–0.90) 5.50 (3.18–9.51) 0.11 (0.05–0.24)
PET measurement
    Qualitative 5 (189) 0.93 (0.87–0.96) 0.85 (0.73–0.92) 6.10 (3.34–11.15) 0.08 (0.04–0.16)
    Quantitative 6 (227) 0.89 (0.79–0.94) 0.89 (0.74–0.96) 8.38 (3.07–22.88) 0.13 (0.07–0.25)
PET or PET/CT
    PET 7 (232) 0.86 (0.78–0.91) 0.89 (0.72–0.96) 7.96 (2.75–23.00) 0.16 (0.10–0.26)
    PET/CT 4 (184) 0.95 (0.89–0.97) 0.86 (0.74–0.93) 6.62 (3.48–12.59) 0.06 (0.03–0.13)
Malignant grade
    Low 5 (97)a 0.90 (0.76–0.96) 0.88 (0.77–0.94) 7.44 (3.68–15.02) 0.12 (0.05–0.30)
    High 7 (132)a 0.98 (0.75–1.00) 0.88 (0.75–0.95) 8.51 (3.78–19.17) 0.02 (0.00–0.34)
    NS 4 (153) 0.87 (0.79–0.93) 0.87 (0.69–0.96) 6.93 (2.52–19.04) 0.15 (0.08–0.26)
Disease status
    SPBT 2 (85) 0.95 (0.85–0.98) 0.83 (0.65–0.93) 5.49 (2.47–12.21) 0.07 (0.02–0.20)
    SRBT 8 (238) 0.92 (0.83–0.97) 0.87 (0.75–0.93) 6.81 (3.39–13.69) 0.09 (0.04–0.21)
    NS 2 (93) 0.88 (0.78–0.94) 0.95 (0.71–0.99) 16.69 (2.47–112.66) 0.13 (0.07–0.24)
Histology
    Glioma 9 (292)b 0.92 (0.85–0.95) 0.87 (0.76–0.93) 7.01 (3.67–13.38) 0.10 (0.05–0.18)
    Nonglioma and NS 4 (182)b 0.88 (0.79–0.93) 0.83 (0.66–0.92) 5.07 (2.39–10.79) 0.14 (0.08–0.28)

Note:—NS indicates not separable; pts, patients.

a

Patients with non-neoplastic lesions in 5 studies2325,30,43 were used for both low and high grade subgroups.

b

Patients with non-neoplastic lesions in 2 studies29,41 were used for both glioma and non-glioma subgroups.