Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;35(12):2227–2236. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4127

Table 4:

Device/procedure/anesthesia–related adverse events during 2 years

No. of Patientsa Kyphoplasty (n = 191) Vertebroplasty (n = 190)
With procedure/device/anesthesia-related (or possibly) AEs 12 11
    Blood and lymphatic disorders Bone marrow edema 0 1b
    Gastrointestinal disorders Constipation 1c 0
    Immune system disorders Hypersensitivity 0 1c
    Injury or procedural complications Cement embolism 1d 1d
Implant site extravasation 0 1e
Mental status changes postoperative 0 1c
Procedural hypotension 1c 0
Procedural nausea/vomiting 1c 0
Procedural pain 3f 3f
Spinal fracture 1g 0
    Musculoskeletal disorders Arthralgia 1g 0
Back pain 2g 3g
Muscle spasm 1g 0
Symptomatic vertebral fracture 1g 2g
    Psychiatric disorders Hallucination 1c 0
    Respiratory disorders COPD 1c 0
Hypoxia 0 1c
Respiratory failure 0 1c
    Vascular disorders Hematoma 0 1h

Note:—COPD indicates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

a

Patients may have had multiple AEs; all system organ class categories are listed when there was an event considered related (or possibly related) to device/procedure/anesthesia.

b

In 1 patient, 1 event was considered nonserious and possibly related to bone cement.

c

In 1 patient, 1 event was considered serious and related (or possibly related) to anesthesia and was resolved with medical intervention.

d

In 1 patient, 1 event each was considered serious and bone cement–related (or possibly related). In each case, the event occurred after the surgical treatment of a subsequent fracture; the BKP event was resolved with oxygen, and the VP event was ongoing at final follow-up.

e

In 1 patient, 1 event was considered bone cement–related and nonserious. A spinal canal leak was detected intraoperatively; CT was immediately performed without significant canal stenosis observed with no medical intervention given.

f

Three patients in each group with 3 (2 serious) and 4 (all serious) events in the BKP and VP groups, respectively, were considered device-related (or possibly related) but were resolved.

g

The number of patients reflected in the Table had events that were considered serious and related (or possibly related) to the device.

h

In 1 patient, 1 event was nonserious and possibly related to the procedure (likely a prone position on the operating table).