Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;35(12):2376–2381. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4052

Table 2:

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of the 3 observersa

Value Global (n = 170) SCC-Related (n = 107) Lymphoma-Related (n = 40)b Benign Conditions (n = 23)
80-kVp image series
    Sensitivity 94.8% (93.5%–95.4%) 94.8% (91.4%–97.2%) 95.0% 94.3% (88.9%–100.0%)
    Specificity 93.0% (91.9%–95.1%) 89.1% (86.5%–91.7%) 100.0% 93.3% (80.0%–100.0%)
    PPV 95.9% (95.3%–97.2%) 94.3% (93.1%–95.8%) 100.0% 98.2% (94.7%–100.0%)
    NPV 91.1% (89.1%–92.1%) 90.1% (84.6%–94.3%) 95.2% 85.7% (71.4%–100.0%)
120-kVp image series
    Sensitivity 94.8% (92.6%–96.3%) 95.3% (91.4%–97.2%) 95.0% 92.5% (88.9%–94.4%)
    Specificity 93.0% (91.9%–95.1%) 89.1% (86.5%–91.7%) 100.0% 93.3% (80.0%–100.0%
    PPV 95.9% (95.3%–97.2%) 94.4% (93.2%–95.8%) 100.0% 98.1% (94.4%–100.0%)
    NPV 91.1% (87.7%–93.5% 91.0% (84.6%–94.3%) 95.2% 79.0% (71.4%–85.7%)
a

Values are given as mean (range).

b

No interobserver differences, therefore no ranges, are given.