Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;13:2389–2399. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S291906

Table 1.

Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer Using Tissue Samples Included in the Review

Author Year Sample Preparation No. of Patients Method Spectral Significance
Krishna
et al41
2007 Normal, benign, and malignant ovarian tissues Paraffin -fixed 24 FTIR and Raman spectroscopy Normal vs malignant: higher protein content and lower DNA and lipid content
8 normal, 10 benign, 6 malignant Benign vs malignant: higher protein content and lower DNA and lipid content
Mehrotra
et al42
2010 Normal and ovarian cancer tissues Frozen sections 12 FTIR spectroscopy Malignant vs normal: higher content of DNA and lipids
Variations in protein secondary structures
Theophilou et al43 2015 Normal, borderline and malignant ovarian tissues Paraffin -fixed sections 171 ATR-FTIR spectroscopy Normal vs malignant: lower lipid/protein ratio, lower phosphate/carbohydrate ratio and higher RNA/DNA ratio
35 benign, 30 borderline, 106 malignant Normal vs borderline: lower phosphate/carbohydrate ratio and higher RNA/DNA ratio
Borderline vs malignant: lower lipid/protein ratio and lower phosphate/carbohydrate ratio
Normal and benign: similar
Grzelak
et al44
2018 Borderline and malignant ovarian tissues Frozen sections 8 SR-FTIR spectroscopy Malignant vs borderline: higher content of proteins, DNA and lipids
1 borderline, 7 malignant
Li et al45 2018 Normal and ovarian cancer cells/tissues Frozen sections 12 FTIR spectroscopy Malignant vs normal cell lines: higher content of proteins, variations in protein secondary structures
Malignant vs normal tissues: lower content of DNA and lipids
6 cell lines