Table 4:

Final models of prediction of mRS ≤1 including either FLAIR-2 volume (model 1) or FLAIR-3 volume (model 2)^a

Variables	OR	95% CI	P Value
Final model including FLAIR-2 volume (model 1)
FLAIR-2 volume (per 10 cm3 increase)	0.79	0.64–0.97	.026
Age
Between 54 and 64 vs <54 years	0.05	0.01–0.32	.017
Between 64 and 74 vs <54 years	1.18	0.22–6.39
Older than 74 vs <54 years	0.09	0.01–0.66
Initial NIHSS score	0.82	0.72–0.93	.003
Reperfusionb
Reperfusion ≥90% vs no abnormality	1.47	0.34–6.45	.005
Reperfusion <90% vs no abnormality	0.06	0.01–0.40
Final model including FLAIR-3 volume (model 2)
FLAIR-3 volume (per 10 cm3 increase)	0.73	0.56–0.96	.023
Age
Between 54 and 64 vs <54 years	0.06	0.01–0.47	.025
Between 64 and 74 vs <54 years	1.54	0.28–8.51
Older than 74 vs <54 years	0.12	0.02–0.81
Initial NIHSS score	0.82	0.71–0.93	.003
Reperfusionb
Reperfusion ≥90% vs no abnormality	1.32	0.31–5.67	.008
Reperfusion <90% vs no abnormality	0.06	0.01–0.43

^aThe Hosmer-Lemeshow test findings were nonsignificant (P = .213 and .969 for models 1 and 2, respectively), indicating a good model fit. The AUC was 0.897 for model 1 and 0.888 for model 2.

^bIf one changed the threshold from 1 to 2, the variable “persistent occlusion” appeared to be strongly related to the clinical outcome (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.44; P = .004 for model 1; OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.36; P = .002 for model 2)