Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr;35(4):644–649. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3749

Table 2:

Image-quality assessmenta

Brain (n = 40) Globe (n = 40) Inferior Rectus Muscle (n = 40) Optic Nerve (n = 40) Cribriform Plate (n = 40) Lamina Papyracea (n = 40) Middle Turbinate (n = 40) Nasal Septum (n = 40) Total (n = 320)
SOFT FBP LD 1.5 (0.51)b 1.6 (0.55)b 1.9 (0.43)b 1.8 (0.52)b 3.3 (0.47) 3.1 (0.38)b 3.3 (0.44) 3.1 (0.38) 2.4 (0.90)b
BONE FBP LD 1.0 (0.00)b 1.0 (0.16)b 1.0 (0.16)b 1.1 (0.27)b 3.7 (0.62)b 3.7 (0.56)b 3.4 (0.58) 3.6 (0.59)b 2.3 (1.35)b
VEO LD 2.8 (0.41) 2.9 (0.35) 3.1 (0.32) 3.1 (0.32) 3.2 (0.48) 2.7 (0.53) 3.2 (0.53) 3.0 (0.45) 3.0 (0.46)
SOFT FBP SD 3.4 (0.55)b 4.0 (0.42)b 4.0 (0.58)b 4.1 (0.40)b 4.0 (0.51)b 3.9 (0.47)b 4.0 (0.55)b 3.9 (0.56)b 3.9 (0.54)b
BONE FBP SD 2.0 (0.28)b 2.5 (0.51)b 3.0 (0.53) 3.1 (0.45) 4.7 (0.47)b 4.9 (0.33)b 4.7 (0.46)b 4.9 (0.36)b 3.7 (1.19)b
a

Values are expressed as mean (SD). Image-quality scale ranges from 1 (unacceptable noise, nondiagnostic) to 5 (excellent image quality, best diagnostic value).

b

Statistically significant difference (P < .001) in paired comparison with VEO LD.