TABLE 3.
Analysis | Effect | √adaLHDr | √adaVHDr | abaVHDr | logeadaVHDs | abaVHDs |
ANOVA | Hap | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Rep | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.001 | <0.01 | ns | |
Rater | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 | – | – | |
Hap:NoGeno | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Tukey’s HSD | Mean difference μL–μH | -0.87 | -1.22 | 1.12 | 0.04 | -1.40 |
P-value | 0.0072 | <0.001 | ns (0.087) | ns | 0.042 |
Tukey’s HSD difference between means of low (L) and high trichome density (H) haplotypes at 12.6–13.4 Mbp on chromosome 1. ada, adaxial; aba, abaxial; LHD, leaf hair density; VHD, vein hair density; r, ribbon trichome; s, simple trichome; √, square root transformation; loge, natural log transformation. AbaLHDr, adaLHDs, and abaLHDs did not have normally distributed residuals after transformation.