Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;33(1):135–140. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2724

Table 2:

Comparison of patterns of nodal necrosis on CT in KD and TLa

KD (n = 24) TL (n = 45) P Value
Extent of necrosis .000
    Mild or moderate 21 (87.5%) 17 (37.8%)
    Severe 3 (12.5%) 28 (62.2%)
No. of necroses .003
    Single 2 (8.4%) 20 (44.4%)
    Multiple 22 (91.6%) 25 (55.6%)
Location of necrosis .339b
    Central 6 (25.0%) 7 (15.6%)
    Peripheral 18 (75.0%) 38 (84.4%)
Margin of necrosis .000
    Indistinct 19 (79.2%) 9 (20.0%)
    Relatively WD or WD 5 (20.8%) 36 (80.0%)
Perinodal infiltration .192b
    Absent 2 (9%) 11 (24%)
    Present 22 (91%) 34 (76%)
Calcification .012b
    Absent 24 (100%) 34 (76%)
    Present 0 (0%) 11 (24%)
CTNc 22 (92%) 19 (42%) .000
CTN/Md 23 (96%) 11 (24%) .000

Note:—WD indicates well-defined; mild, <30% of an affected lymph node; moderate, 30%–70% of an affected lymph node; severe, >70% of an affected lymph node.

a

Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as the number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.

b

Calculated with the Fisher exact test. The other categoric variables were compared using the χ2 test.

c

CTN of >44.5 HU is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.

d

CTN/M of >0.7 is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.