Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;63(4):491–498. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02533-6

Table 3.

Agreement comparison of Frontier ASPECTS and observers and agreement between observers in the test set (n = 355)

Agreement on normal regions (n) Agreement on abnormal regions (n) Overall agreement (%) Trichotomizeda ASPECTS agreement (%) ASPECTS ICC (95% CI)
Frontier ASPECTS (default thresholds) vs. reference standard 2046 613 2785 (78) 200/355 (56) .494 (.412–.569)
Frontier ASPECTS (optimized thresholds for [CN/ IC/ INS/ LN] & [M1-M6 regions]) vs. reference standard 2276 507 2783 (78) 213/355 (60) .526 (.447–.597)
Frontier ASPECTS (1 optimized threshold for all 10 regions) vs. reference standard 2274 533 2807 (79) 210/355 (59) .537 (.459–.607)
observer 1 vs. reference standard 2430 536 2742 (84) 212/355 (60) .464 (.378–.542)
observer 2 vs. reference standard 2353 389 2742 (77) 204/355 (57) .383 (.291–.468)
observer 1 vs. observer 2 2713 337 3050 (86) 238/273 (77) .667 (.605–.721)

aclassification by ASPECTS 0–4, 5–7 and 8–10