Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;34(1):146–152. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3169

Table 3.

Clot location in patients with and without recanalization, good outcome, or CMR

Clot Location CT Angiographic Recanalization
Good Outcome
Clinically Meaningful Recanalization
Yes (n = 73) No (n = 53) Yes (n = 45) No (n = 81) Yes (n = 36) No (n = 90)
ICA 8 (11.0)a 23 (43.4) 7 (15.6) 24 (29.6) 3 (8.3)a 28 (31.1)
Proximal M1 10 (13.7)a 7 (13.2) 4 (8.9)a 13 (16.0) 4 (11.1)a 13 (14.4)
Distal M1 27 (37.0) 10 (18.9) 13 (28.9) 24 (29.6) 14 (38.9) 23 (25.6)
M2–M4 28 (38.4) 13 (24.5) 21 (46.7)a 20 (24.7) 15 (41.7) 26 (28.9)

Note:—Location represents the most proximal site of occlusion. Data are frequency (%). P values were obtained with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis, followed by Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests.

a

P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.