Table 2:
Summary of tumor grades, 62Cu-ATSM uptake values, MR findings, and HIF-1α expression
| Case No. | WHO Grade |
62Cu-ATSM |
Enhancement on MRI | HIF-1α Expressiona | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUVmax | SUVmean ± SD | T/B Ratio | ||||
| 1 | III | 0.51 | 0.38 ± 0.07 | 0.7 | E | Negative |
| 2 | IV | 4.33 | 1.79 ± 0.58 | 9.7 | E+N | Positive |
| 3 | II | 0.59 | 0.43 ± 0.10 | 0.7 | None | Negative |
| 4 | III | 0.92 | 0.59 ± 0.14 | 1.8 | E | Positive |
| 5 | III | 0.73 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | 2.3 | E+N | Negative |
| 6 | IV | 1.84 | 1.30 ± 0.21 | 2.5 | E+N | Positive |
| 7 | III | 1.02 | 0.73 ± 0.24 | 1.6 | E | Negative |
| 8 | IV | 1.15 | 0.76 ± 0.14 | 2.0 | E+N | Positive |
| 9 | II | 0.44 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | 1.0 | E | Negative |
| 10 | III | 1.01 | 0.58 ± 0.16 | 1.5 | E | Negative |
| 11 | IV | 2.04 | 1.29 ± 0.17 | 1.9 | E+N | Positive |
| 12 | IV | 1.17 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 3.0 | E+N | Positive |
| 13 | II | 0.67 | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 1.3 | E | Negative |
| 14 | IV | 1.32 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 4.3 | E+N | Positive |
| 15 | IV | 1.35 | 0.84 ± 0.19 | 1.9 | E+N | Positive |
| 16 | II | 1.59 | 0.80 ± 0.14 | 1.8 | E | Positive |
| 17 | III | 0.46 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.4 | E | Negative |
| 18 | IV | 1.62 | 0.69 ± 0.17 | 1.5 | E+N | Positive |
| 19 | III | 1.46 | 0.80 ± 0.13 | 1.3 | E | Negative |
| 20 | IV | 1.54 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 1.9 | E+N | Positive |
| 21 | IV | 1.82 | 0.91 ± 0.15 | 2.6 | E+N | Positive |
| 22 | IV | 0.94 | 0.68 ± 0.17 | 2.3 | E+N | Positive |
Note:—E indicates contrast enhancement without necrosis; E+N, contrast enhancement with necrosis; None, no enhancement; SUVmax, maximum standard uptake value; SUVmean, mean standard uptake value.
Negative indicates <5% HIF-1α-positive cells; positive indicates ≥5% HIF-1α-positive cells.