Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;35(7):1371–1375. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3873

Table 3:

Cox proportional hazards model to find factors associated with aneurysm reduction

Single Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Multiple Cox Proportional Hazards Modela
Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Value Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Value
Age (yr) 0.93 0.89–0.98 .003 0.99 0.93–1.05 .63
Male sex 0.68 0.25–1.86 .46
Clinical presentation at diagnosis
    Asymptomatic Reference Reference
    Pain 14.7 1.94–111 .009 3.63 0.38–34.8 .26
    Mass effect 7.94 0.50–127 .14 13.3 0.59–299 .10
Size
    Maximum diameter (mm) 0.61 0.46–0.82 .001 0.58 0.41–0.84 .004
    ≥10 mm 0.29 0.04–2.26 .24
Hypertension 0.08 0.02–0.35 .001 0.12 0.02–0.70 .018
Diabetesb
Hyperlipidemia 0.47 0.11–2.08 .32
Smoking 0.78 0.29–2.13 .63
Location
    Left 1.39 0.16–12.5 .77
    Right 2.87 0.37–22.1 .31
    Bilateral Reference

Note:—CI indicates confidence interval.

a

Variables that were statistically significant in single Cox proportional hazards models were used in the multiple Cox proportional hazards models. The cutoff point of the P value was set at <.05.

b

All 6 patients with diabetes were excluded from this analysis because their aneurysms were unchanged.