Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;12:1698. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21868-z

Table 1.

Comparison of GHG emissions reduction (including fossil fuel offset) for pyrolysis systems with sequestration or use of biochar as fuel and use of other biofuels and products.

Study Process Product applications GHG emissions reduction intensity (g CO2-eq MJ−1)
This study

Biomass

pyrolysis poly-generation system

Temperature: 600 °C

Residence time: >1800 s

Biochar: soil application

Pyrolysis gas: substitution of coke oven gas and electricity production

Bio-oil: substitution of coal tar in chemical raw materials

136.45

Biochar: charcoal substitution in industries

Pyrolysis gas: substitution of coke oven gas and electricity production

Bio-oil: substitution of coal tar in chemical raw materials

46.80
Peters et al.28 (Spain)

Biomass slow pyrolysis system

Temperature: 450 °C

Residence time: ~2500 s

Biochar: soil application

Pyrolysis gas: heat production for pyrolysis system and substitution of natural gas

Bio-oil: heat production for pyrolysis system

122.18

Biochar: charcoal substitution in coal power plant

Pyrolysis gas: heat production for pyrolysis system and substitution of natural gas

Bio-oil: heat production for pyrolysis system

63.22a
Roberts et al14. (the United States)

Biomass slow pyrolysis system

Temperature: 450 °C

Residence time: long enough

Biochar: soil application

Pyrolysis gas: substitution of natural gas for heat product

108.57

Biochar: charcoal substitution in IGCC plant

Pyrolysis gas: substitution of natural gas for heat product

36.64

aThe reference does not consider the GHG emissions derived from construction process (e.g., equipment and installation) in life-cycle assessment.