Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;23:e00115. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00115

Table 4.

Validation of gp60 gene target using Canadian and UK isolates.

Sample origin Number of samples Number (%) contigs produced Number (%) called correctly and able to produce contig Number (%) called incorrectly Number (%) flagged requiring manual analysis Number (%) flagged in agreement with manual analysis Number (%) flagged that are further resolved with manual analysis Number (%) samples that a contig was unable to be produceda Number (%) non-contig samples in agreement with manual analysis in one or both directionsa Number (%) non-contig samples further resolved with manual analysisa
Canada:
Reverse 36 N/A 30 (83.3%) 0 (0%) 6 (16.7%) 6 (100%) 0 (0%) N/A N/A N/A
Contig 109b 96 (88.1%) 65 (67.7%) 0 (0%) 31 (32.3%) 29 (93.5%) 2 (6.5%) 13 (11.9%) 11 (84.6%) 2 (15.4%)



UK:
Reverse 610c N/A 550 (90.2%) 0 (0%) 60 (9.8%) 31 (51.7%) 29 (48.3%) N/A N/A N/A
Contig 236d 213 (90.3%) 207 (97.2%) 0 (0%) 6 (2.8%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 23 (9.7%) 18 (78.3%) 5 (21.7%)



Total:
Reverse 646 N/A 580 (89.8%) 0 (0%) 66 (10.2%) 37 (56.1%) 29 (43.9%) N/A N/A N/A
Contig 345 309 (89.6%) 272 (88.0%) 0 (0%) 37 (12.0%) 29 (78.4%) 8 (21.6%) 36 (10.4%) 29 (80.6%) 7 (19.4%)
a

Contig mode only.

b

2 samples were not typable either by CryptoGenotyper or manually so have been removed from this total.

c

88 samples were not typable either by CryptoGenotyper or manually so have been removed from this total.

d

13 samples were not typable either by CryptoGenotyper or manually so have been removed from this total.