Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;10(5):1146. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051146

Table 1.

An overview of clinical trials on stroke prevention in heart failure.

Year Clinical Trial No. of Patients Type of HF Mean LVEF, % Heart Rhythm Mean FU, Months Results
2004 WASH (Warfarin/Aspirin Study in Heart Failure) [84] 279 HFrEF ≤35 SR 27 No difference in PO (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) between warfarin vs. aspirin vs. no antithrombotic treatment
2006 HELAS (Heart Failure Long-term Antithrombotic Study) [85] 197 HFrEF <35 SR 22 No difference in PO (nonfatal stroke, peripheral or pulmonary embolism, myocardial re-infarction, re-hospitalization, exacerbation of heart failure, or death from any causes) between aspirin vs. anticoagulant therapy
2009 PROTECT AF (WATCHMAN left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) [104] 707 Chronic HF ≥30 AF 48 No difference in PO (stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death) between LAA closure vs. warfarin
2009 WATCH (Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure) [83] 1587 HFrEF <35 SR/AF 21 No difference in PO (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) between warfarin vs. aspirin vs. clopidogrel. Reduction in strokes but more hemorrhage in warfarin treatment
2012 WARCEF (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction) [86] 2305 HFrEF 25 SR 72 No difference in PO (death, ischemic stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage) between aspirin vs. warfarin. Prevention of ischemic strokes but more major hemorrhage
2014 PREVAIL (Evaluation of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) [105] 407 Chronic HF ≥30–<35 AF 48 No difference in PO (stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death) between the LAA closure vs. warfarin
2015 ACTIVE (Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events) [81] 3487 HFrEF
HFpEF
<45 AF 43 No difference in PO (stroke, transient attack and systemic embolism) between HFrEF vs. HFpEF
2017 COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) [92] 27,395 HFrEF NA AF 23 Improved cardiovascular outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction) but more major bleedings in patients with rivaroxaban and aspirin
2018 COMMANDER HF (Rivaroxaban in Patients with Heart Failure, Sinus Rhythm, and Coronary Disease) [89] 5022 HFrEF <40 SR 20 No difference in PO (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke) between treatment with antiplatelet agents and rivaroxaban in addition to antiplatelet agents.
2020 EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) [103] 2789 HFrEF NA AFF 61 The prevention of stroke by rhythm-control therapy in patients with AF and cardiovascular conditions
2020 LAARGE (Left-Atrium-Appendage occlude Register-Germany registry) [101] 619 HFpEF
HFmrEF
HFrEF
>55
36–55
≤35
AF 12 The efficacy of LAA closure in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF
2020 PRAGUE-17 (Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Novel Anticoagulation Agents in Atrial Fibrillation) [100] 402 Chronic HF NA AF 21 No difference in occurrence of stroke and increased risk of bleeding between LAA closure and therapy with direct oral anticoagulant

AFF, atrial fibrillation or flutter; CHF, chronic heart failure; CV, cardiovascular; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LAA, left atrial appendage; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PO, primary outcome; SR, sinus rhythm; TIA, transient ischemic attack.