Table 4.

Results of 16-item usability test (N=30).

Item		Range	Usability, mean (SD)
Ease of use
	1. How convenient do you think the smart glass–based core nursing education program is?	3-10	8.10 (1.58)
	2. Was the initial education regarding the device and usage appropriate?	5-10	8.77 (1.46)
	3. Was the text information presented on the screen easy to read?	3-10	7.27 (2.26)
	4. Was the picture information presented on the screen clearly understood?	4-10	8.17 (1.90)
	5. Was the resolution of the screen good?	4-10	7.20 (2.02)
	6. Did you have any difficulties because of errors that occurred during the performance?	1-10	3.83 (2.73)
	7. Was the progression speed adequate?	5-10	8.63 (1.22)
	8. Was the location of the information on the smart glass appropriate? Consistent? Easy to see?	3-10	8.53 (1.85)
	9. Was it convenient to operate the smart glass?	6-10	8.40 (1.48)
Usefulness
	10. Did the pictures and text information shown help you perform core basic nursing skills?	6-10	9.07 (1.05)
	11. Was this type of educational program interesting?	7-10	9.50 (0.86)
	12. Did you expect better scores using the smart glass training program?	6-10	8.90 (1.21)
	13. Did you have a better understanding of core basic nursing techniques using augmented reality?	5-10	8.77 (1.48)
	14. Would you recommend the smart glass–based core nursing education program to other friends?	3-10	8.70 (2.00)
	15. Do you think smart glass core nursing education will be useful in clinical practice in the future?	4-10	8.77 (1.61)
	16. Are you willing to use a smart glass for other core nursing skills in the future?	5-10	8.87 (1.57)