Table 1.
Comparison of crown marginal adaptation and crown contour quality among different laboratories.
| Marginal Adaptation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Fit Criteria-Based Evaluation. | Government LABs (N and Row %) |
Commercial LABs (N and Row %) |
Total (N and Column %) |
p Value |
| Excellent | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | 4 (12.5) | 0.007 |
| Acceptable | 10 (45.5) | 12 (54.5) | 22 (68.8) | |
| Acceptable with modifications | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 (12.5) | |
| Unacceptable | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.20) | |
| Crown Contours | ||||
| Quality of Contours Criteria-Based Evaluation. | Government LABs (N and Row Percentage) |
Commercial LABs (N and Row Percentage) |
Total (N and Column %) |
p Value |
| Excellent | 2 (16.6) | 10 (83.4) | 12 (37.5) | 0.002 |
| Acceptable | 2 (33.4) | 4 (66.6) | 6 (18.75) | |
| Acceptable with modifications | 8 (80) | 2 (20) | 10 (31.25) | |
| Unacceptable | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 (12.5) | |