Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052459

Table 2.

Quality evaluation of the selected studies.

Controlled
Trial
Carissoli
(2015)
[16]
David
(2018)
[17]
Levin
(2017)
[18]
Pham
(2016)
[19]
Yang
(2018)
[20]
Mohr
(2017)
[21]
Ebert
(2016)
[22]
Wylde
(2017)
[23]
Bakker
(2018)
[24]
Arean
(2016)
[25]
Winslow (2016)
[26]
Lee
(2018)
[27]
Flett
(2019)
[28]
Hwang
(2019)
[29]
1.1 The study addresses an appropriate and clearly focused question. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
1.2 The assignment of subjects to treatment groups is randomized. Y NA Y Y NA Y NA Y Y Y Y Y Y
1.3 An adequate concealment method is used. CS NA Y Y NA Y NA Y Y N Y Y CS
1.4 The design keeps subjects and investigators ‘blind’ about treatment allocation. CS NA N Y NA Y NA Y Y N Y Y CS
1.5 The treatment and control groups are similar at the start of the trial Y * Y Y NA Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
1.6 The only difference between groups is the treatment under investigation. Y NA Y Y NA Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
1.7 All relevant outcomes are measured in a standard, valid, and reliable way. N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y CS Y Y Y Y
1.8 What percentage of the individuals or clusters recruited into each treatment arm of the study dropped out before the study was completed? 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 6.8% 5.7% 0.4% 0.0% 35.8% 55.4% (4 weeks)
64.3% (8 weeks)
69.7% (12 weeks)
0.0% 20.9% 1.0% 6.7%
1.9 All the subjects are analyzed in the groups to which they were randomly allocated (often referred to as intention to treat analysis). Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
1.10 Where the study is carried out at more than one site, results are comparable for all sites. CS Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Overall assessment of the study. + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++

Y = YES; N = No; CS = cannot say; NA = Not applied; * = intervention group.