Table 2.
Cyclists Risk Perception and Regulation Scale (RPRS) item scores (scale 1–5).
| Factor (Cronbach’s Alpha) | Item | M (SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of Traffic Rules (0.62) | I readily recognise traffic signals | 4.78 (0.65) |
| I know the basic rules governing other types of vehicles | 4.77 (0.61) | |
| I believe that pedestrians should always have the priority, even towards cyclists | 3.85 (1.09) | |
| I easily identify areas prohibited to traffic or bicycle parking | 4.23 (0.86) | |
| Overall, I know the bicycle safety regulations of my city/town | 4.52 (0.68) | |
| I am aware of the potential consequences of being involved in a crash, for example, with another vehicle | 4.67 (0.68) | |
| I perceive potentially higher risks for my integrity when I ride a bicycle, than when I am on board of a motorised vehicle | 4.51 (0.82) | |
| Risk Perception (0.68) | I am always aware of the other vehicles that surround me on the road | 4.53 (0.62) |
| I realise that there are signalling and infrastructure problems that can affect my safety | 4.50 (0.65) | |
| I believe that being under the influence of certain substances (alcohol, illegal and/or prescribed drugs) affects my ability to ride well | 4.74 (0.58) | |
| I am aware of the risks involved in using headphones and phones while I ride | 4.60 (0.77) | |
| Riding in urban areas is especially risky, considering the number of vehicles and the complexity of the roads | 4.17 (0.99) |