Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;21:54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01243-8

Table 1.

Relevant global screening factors identified for the MACUSTAR study in qualitative evaluation ordered by estimated magnitude of impact on screening numbers

Screening measures Factors prioritized in qualitative interviews* Other factors
All sites Change of inclusion criteria (opening for individuals with unilateral intermediate disease) (#8) Dissemination material (patient flyer, referral letter, study procedure flyers, sample visit schedules)
Increase of participant travel expenses reimbursement (#3) Distribution of study newsletter
Investigator teleconferences (#6)
Investigator meetings (conferences) (#7) Letter of appreciation for clinical sites at recruitment start
Increase of study newsletter frequency (monthly to biweekly) (#4) Implementation of a clinical site questionnaire to identify unsolved issues
Regular coordination teleconferences with the project management and monitors (#5)
Single sites Pre-screening lists
Individual contacts with investigators (e-mail, phone, in person)
Individual contacts with site coordinators
Appearing in the newsletter as a “top recruiter”
Interacting factors Public holiday (#2) Competitive recruitment
Reaching a high proportion of the initial “recruitment target” or exceeding this target (#9) Communication of recruiting problems by individual sites
Successive initiation of screening activity (#1) Problems with study devices at individual sites
Consortium core membership (#10)

* only global factors that could be assigned to specific time periods were allowed

Factors preceded by a # sign were considered relevant in the qualitative evaluation and are displayed in the ranking order obtained in the qualitative evaluation