Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Nov 9;1480(1):246–256. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14525

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Comparison of lung injury in MRI and CT images. Upper panels. Representative images of MRI derived lung injury (shown in red) and CT derived fluid accumulation (shown in cyan) 28 d following NM administration to rats. Lower panel. Slope of the least squares line of best fit and the correlation coefficient between areas identified as fluid by CT and lung injury by MRI. Dashed lines, 5–95% confidence interval for slope = −1.2–6.17; 5–95% confidence interval for intercept = −3.22 to 32.15 (n = 14).