Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;36(2):322–331. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.040

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Variable Male (n = 6,413) Female (n = 6,148) p valuea
Age, yr 57.5 ± 13.8 57.8 ± 13.5 0.695
 20–39 754 (11.6) 584 (9.5)
 40–59 2,615 (40.8) 2,545 (41.4)
 60–75 2,505 (39.1) 2,527 (41.1)
 > 75 548 (8.5) 492 (8.0)
Indications of colonoscopy
 Screening 2,599 (40.5) 2,535 (41.2) 0.425
 Symptoms 1,089 (17.0) 1,420 (23.1) < 0.001
 Colorectal cancer 406 (6.3) 289 (4.7) < 0.001
 Polyp 1,156 (18.0) 666 (10.8) < 0.001
 Inflammatory bowel disease 371 (5.8) 214 (3.5) < 0.001
 Others 792 (12.3) 1,024 (16.7)
Non-sedation colonoscopy 68 (1.0) 54 (0.8) 0.503
Sedation colonoscopy 6,345 (98.9) 6,094 (99.2)
 Midazolam, mg 4.5 ± 1.0 4.3 ± 1.2 < 0.001
 Pethidine, mg 36.7 ± 12.8 38.2 ± 12.9 0.001
Bowel preparation drugb < 0.001
 Coolprep 6,248 (97.6) 5,912 (96.3)
 Picosolution 156 (2.4) 225 (3.7)

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

a

p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

b

Missing value: preparation drug. Twenty cases (nine males, 11 females) could not be identified in the Clinical Data Warehouse.

Maybe these subjects received prescription of preparation drug from other doctors.