Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;36(2):322–331. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.040

Table 4.

Difference of BBPS according to bowel preparation drugs

Variable Male (n = 6,404)a Female (n = 6,137)a p valueb
BBPS, total score
 Coolprep (n = 12,160) 7.2 ± 1.9 7.4 ± 1.8 0.026
 Picosolution (n = 381) 7.6 ± 1.7 7.6 ± 1.7 0.927
BBPS, total ≥ 6
 Coolprep 0.001
  BBPS, total ≥ 6 5,288 (84.6) 5,125 (86.7)
  BBPS, total < 6 960 (15.4) 787 (13.3)
 Picosolution 0.926
  BBPS, total ≥ 6 141 (90.4) 204 (90.7)
  BBPS, total < 6 15 (9.6) 21 (9.3)
Achievement of adequacyc
 Coolprep < 0.001
  Adequate 4,956 (79.3) 4,841 (81.9)
  Inadequate 1,292 (20.7) 1,071 (18.1)
 Picosolution 0.732
  Adequate 134 (85.9) 196 (87.1)
  Inadequate 22 (14.1) 29 (12.9)

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

BBPS, Boston bowel preparation score.

a

Missing value: preparation drug. Twenty cases (nine males, 11 females) for preparation drugs could not be identified in the clinical data warehouse. Maybe these subjects received prescription of preparation drug from other doctors.

b

p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

c

Patients with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 for all colon segments.